|
|
How critical is the resurrection to the Christian
System? Let Paul respond: "If Christ is not risen, then our
preaching is empty and your faith is also empty. Yes, and we are
found false witnesses of God, because we have testified of God
that He raised up Christ, whom He did not raise upif in fact the
dead do not rise. For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is
not risen. And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you
are still in your sins!" (1 Corinthians 15.14-17).
Paul knew that the resurrection was and is an
essential part of the Christian faith; destroy the possibility
of the resurrection and destroy Christianity. For that reason
there is no equivocation in 1 Corinthians 15! It is not written
in think-so, could-be, might-be, seems-like, and probability language.
Rather it is written in absolutes! "There is a natural body
and there is a spiritual body" (1 Corinthians 15.44). And,
the natural body precedes the spiritual body (1 Corinthians 15.46).
Just as surely as there is a natural body in the present, there
will be a spiritual body in the future. The denial of the resurrection
remains equivalent to the denial of the apostles' doctrine, of
the Holy Spirit's teachings, of the express statements of Jesus,
and of the affirmations of the Father.
However, one might legitimately ask, "What
proof is there of the resurrection?" Paul responded to those
who might ask in his day with irrefutable proofs. "Jesus,"
says he, "is become the firstfruits of those who have fallen
asleep" (1 Corinthians 15.20). His statement is absolutely
packed with meaning. The firstfruits among the Hebrew nation had
historically served as a guarantee that the latter-fruit would
be dedicated to the holy purposes of Jehovah. From of old, they
had been accustomed to bringing the first of their produce and
offering it before the Lord (cf. Deuteronomy 26.2 and Leviticus
23.10-11). The firstfruits by common use became synonymous with
the idea of a guarantee. In fact, that was the express purpose
of the firstfruits offering. Paul capitalized on this well know
Jewish tradition to illustrate that God had effectively done the
same thing regarding the resurrection. He had guaranteed latter-fruits
(the general resurrection of the dead) would occur by means of
the resurrection of Jesus from the dead. The argument goes like
this, If Jesus was raised from the dead then we are guaranteed
that others will also be raised in due order.
Someone says, "How do we know that Jesus
was raised from the dead? We have not seen Him!" One line
of argumentation to respond to this question could have been,
"If He is not raised, where is His body?" Since the
resurrection of Jesus was almost immediately proclaimed publicly
in the regions in and around Jerusalem (Acts 2 & 3), all that
would have been needed to disprove the resurrection claim was
for someone to produce the lifeless remains of the Christ. This
would have silenced the claims of His resurrection forever. Christianity
would have become a prison like all other philosophies of man.
However, the body of Jesus was not produced. Given the determination
of the Sanhedrin as well as others having an interest in quelling
the claims of the Christians, had such a feat been possible, it
would have been done. The absence of the body was and is powerful
tacit evidence for the resurrection.
Someone objects and says, "But that is arguing
from the lack of evidence? What positive proof is there that the
one called Jesus actually did arise from the tomb on the third
day?" Paul is ready to respond to that questioner also! "He
was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. After that He was seen
by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part
remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. After that
He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. Then last of all
He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time" (1
Corinthians 15.5-8). Effectively Paul says, there are currently
more than 250 eyewitnesses who stand willing and ready to testify
to the truthfulness of the claims of the resurrection of Jesus!
If it is evidence you need, evidence is readily available!
"But what kind of body will the resurrected
dead have?" (See 1 Corinthians 15.35.) We permit Paul to
respond again: "Foolish one, what you sow is not made alive
unless it dies. And what you sow, you do not sow that body that
shall be, but mere grainperhaps wheat or some other grain. But
God gives it a body as He pleases, and to each seed its own body"
(1 Corinthians 15: 36-38). The natural realm is subject to the
scientific method of experimentation, theories, proofs, verifications
and other similar disciplines. However, the spiritual realm, by
definition, lies outside the realm of the natural and hence is
not subject to the same laws as the natural realm. If one can
accept the fact that God is able to change a tiny seed sown in
the earth into a large plant in a vastly different form than the
seed, surely one can accept the fact that He is able to do a similar
work with the human body. When one accepts the fact that the resurrection
is in the hands of Creator, God, the details are not all that
important but for curiosity's sake.
Wrapped up in the questions of the resurrection
are the fundamentals of the Christian faith. Without the resurrection,
the rewards that are anticipated as a result of the Lord's sacrifice
on our behalf could not be received. Without the resurrection,
the privations suffered by believers go without recompense. Without
the resurrection, evildoers suffer the same fate as the redeemed.
Without the resurrection, God's exaltation is only as it is depicted
so pitifully here upon this earth. Without the resurrection, Jesus'
sacrifice is of no more significance than any other martyr who
has died for a cause. Without the resurrection every injustice
that remains yet unresolved will remain that way for eternity;
the sense of fairness and justice that drive all civilized people
is but a theory with no means of implementation.
With the resurrection, watch: "'Death is
swallowed up in victory. O Death, where is your sting? O Hades,
where is your victory?' The sting of death is sin, and the strength
of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory
through our Lord Jesus Christ" (1 Corinthians 15.54-57).
It is no more possible to have Christianity without the resurrection
than it is to have a house without an exit. A house without an
exit becomes a prison and Christianity without the resurrection
becomes the same. "Therefore, my beloved brethren, be steadfast,
immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that
your labor is not in vain in the Lord" (1 Corinthians 15.58).
|
|